Note: I was holding off on publishing this post until there was some corroboration. See below.
Is Big Brother is watching not only journalists and bloggers, but anyone who uses social media? So says the Russia Times. Under normal circumstances this wouldn’t be that bothersome to me. But considering that our president just signed a bill and promised not to detain Americans, and then scrapped the Constitution and precedent so he could get his way on nominees, I’m not inclined to cut the administration much slack.
Freedom of speech might allow journalists to get away with a lot in America, but the Department of Homeland Security is on the ready to make sure that the government is keeping dibs on who is saying what.Where’s the American media? Don’t they get paid to investigate this sort of thing?
Under the National Operations Center (NOC)’s Media Monitoring Initiative that came out of DHS headquarters in November, Washington has the written permission to retain data on users of social media and online networking platforms.
Specifically, the DHS announced the NCO and its Office of Operations Coordination and Planning (OPS) can collect personal information from news anchors, journalists, reporters or anyone who may use “traditional and/or social media in real time to keep their audience situationally aware and informed.”
According to the Department of Homeland Security’s own definition of personal identifiable information, or PII, such data could consist of any intellect “that permits the identity of an individual to be directly or indirectly inferred, including any information which is linked or linkable to that individual.” Previously established guidelines within the administration say that data could only be collected under authorization set forth by written code, but the new provisions in the NOC’s write-up means that any reporter, whether someone along the lines of Walter Cronkite or a budding blogger, can be victimized by the agency. (Read More)
Update: Now that the news is not coming only from Russia:
Based on a privacy compliance review from last November recently obtained by Reuters, the purpose of the project is to “collect information used in providing situational awareness and establishing a common operating picture.” Whatever that means. Either way, the list of sites reported by Reuters reveals in a Wednesday afternoon exclusive is pretty intriguing… (Read More)Just for the record, on several occasions I’ve checked my site meter and found this site being watched by DHS. So I guess this is nothing new.